Atomic learning storyboard pro12/2/2023 ![]() ![]() Fairlie, in Handbook of the Economics of Education, 2016 2.3.2 Computer-Assisted InstructionĬAI is the use of specific software programs on computers in the classroom. 14 Frequently these programs are individualized or self-paced in order to accommodate differences in student ability or speed. CAI lends itself to evaluation using RCTs because access to software can be offered at the student or classroom level. ![]() CAI frequently targets a specific subject area that is tested before and after the software is introduced. Kulik and Kulik (1991) and Liao (1992) summarize the early education literature, which generally suggests positive effects. The evidence from economic studies is mixed and suggests that the characteristics of the intervention are important. Studies in this area differ significantly in the extent to which CAI is a substitute or a supplement to traditional instruction. Interestingly, evidence of positive effects appears to be the strongest in developing countries. This could be due to the fact that the instruction that is being substituted for is not as of high quality in these countries. Rouse and Krueger's (2004) evaluation of “Fast ForWord,” a language and reading program, is one of the earliest examples of evaluating a specific CAI using an RCT. They conducted a randomized study that exploited within-school, within-grade variation at four schools that serve a high fraction of nonnative English speakers in the northeastern United States. The intervention pulled students out of their otherwise scheduled classes to receive 90–100 min of individualized CAI. Support teachers, staff, students, and parents with resources that help simplify instruction and engage learners. The instruction these students missed was not necessarily in reading and language, so treated students received supplemental instruction in this subject area as a result. An online professional learning system designed to meet the needs of todays schools and districts. Despite the construction of the experiment, which favors gains in reading and language skills, they find little to no positive effects across a range of standardized tests that should be correlated with reading and language skills. The authors argue that computers may not be as effective as traditional classroom instruction. Department of Education and Mathematica Policy Research ( 2007 2009) evaluated six reading and four math software products for students in elementary, middle, and high school. Randomization was across teachers within the same schools. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |